Kitatasumi.com

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Korean Unification Flag?

Korean Unification Flag

Most people are familiar with the fact that the Korean peninsula and Korean people have been separated for over half a century. Following the Second World War, the nation was divided along the 38th parallel and each nation developed along different routes. The Northerners embraced Communism and followed the Juche ideal, while their southern neighbors became an outpost of the capitalist system on the Asian mainland.

Yet while disagreements remain, it appears that both nations have an earnest desire for reconciliation and cultural diplomacy has been a useful vehicle in promoting unification.

The recent trend for North Korea and South Korea to compete together as one nation in global sports events is certainly a positive development. The two nations started competing together in 1991 at the World Table Tennis Championship in Japan in and the World Football Championships in Lisbon. While the two nations did not compete together in the Beijing Olympics, they did march together under one flag in Sydney 2000, Athens in 2004, Turin 2006 and the Doha Games in 2006.

Anyone familiar with tensions between North and South Korea will agree this represents a breakthrough in relations. Yet, this begs a question; what flag do they march under?
The answer is simple. They march under the Korean Unification Flag.

This flag was first used in 1991 during the table tennis championships in Japan and was designed specially for this event. This flag not only represent each nation’s desires for unification, but is in itself a monument to the cooperation which made it possible.

Yet, unfortunately all is not well in the flag department.

Recently a disagreement has erupted between the North and South over the use of the flag and national anthems in and an impending preliminary match in Pyongyang in March of 2010. It seems that North Korea would like the unification flag to fly and a neutral Korean anthem to be played at the start of the match. However, Federation International Football Association (FIFA) regulations stipulate that during FIFA games, each nation’s individual flag must be flown.
North Korea argues that this violates the spirit of the June 15th Joint Declaration the two nations share. The FIFA governing body has been called in to moderate the disagreement.

Yet, there are other issues. The flag, which consists of a blue silhouette of the Korean peninsula on a white background, now includes the Liancourt Rocks a territory who ownership is disputed with Japan.

Advertisements

May 19, 2010 - Posted by | Background Info, Politics

2 Comments »

  1. This is an interesting article but it doesn’t really resonate with tensions rising in the region. It looks like peace is still a long way off.

    The North makes plenty of ceremonial concessions, like the demolition of a nuclear reactor while Christiane Amanpour looks on in satisfaction and tells us that the world is a safer place. But in reality, they have made no significant moves toward peace.

    What is your opinion on the situation now that North Korea has sunk a South Korean vessel?

    Comment by Spencer | June 9, 2010 | Reply

  2. Well, you certainly have me there. This article was actually written before the Cheonon was sunk.Shame about what happened to those sailors.

    I don’t buy into the Dear Leader consuming the peninsula in a fireball nor do I think South Korea would attack North Korea. So the North, being how they are, can pull stunts like this and the South wont retaliate. That’s not to say this will go unanswered.At the same time, I dont see how a conflict would benefit the US. The North Korean regime is entrenched, with or with out their Dear Leader.

    I hope I dont ever have to eat my words but it seems that the status quo on the Korean Peninsula suits everyone just fine the way it is.

    Because the alternatives to war could be just as bad.
    If the regime did somehow break down, millions of hungry North Koreans pouring into China would certainly force China’s hand. South Korea doesn’t need any of that either on their side of the border.

    On the other hand, the chances for a peaceful reunification in the our lifetime seem low.
    Should actual peace and nuclear disarmament occur, the US would probably withdraw many of their troops in the region. Wouldn’t this more or less lead to an arms race with South Korea and Japan redoubling efforts to contain a triumphant North Korea? How is that good?
    So I dont think its the first or last time we will see something like this.

    Comment by martinmilinski | June 11, 2010 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s